Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

anti-heartbalm statute

Read a random definition: Dutch lottery

A quick definition of anti-heartbalm statute:

An anti-heartbalm statute is a law in some states that eliminates the right to sue for emotional distress caused by a loss of love or relationship. This includes lawsuits for alienation of affections, breach of promise to marry, criminal conversation, and seduction of a person over the legal age of consent. These laws were created because it is difficult to prove the cause of a loss and there is potential for abusive prosecution. Some people call these laws anti-heartbalm statutes, but the more common term is heartbalm statute.

A more thorough explanation:

An anti-heartbalm statute is a law in some states that eliminates the right to sue for monetary damages due to emotional distress caused by a loss of love and relationship. This includes lawsuits for alienation of affections, breach of promise to marry, criminal conversation, and seduction of a person over the legal age of consent.

For example, if someone breaks off an engagement, the other person cannot sue for damages under an anti-heartbalm statute. These laws were created because it is difficult to determine the cause of a loss and there is potential for abusive prosecution.

Heartbalm statutes were originally created under English common law, where a broken engagement could result in a lawsuit for breach of promise to marry. However, widespread criticism of these lawsuits led to the passage of heartbalm statutes in many US jurisdictions beginning in the 1930s.

antihazing statute | Anti-Injunction Act

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:37
stummy hurt
18:40
wait why??
18:40
I haven’t watched them
18:41
just cus i wanted to hear ab i could relate too more instead of people that sound like way better candidates than me
18:42
what makes them better candidates than you?
18:43
they all had like 175's and either really strong professor recs or like owned a business
18:43
or other extracurricular stuff
18:43
strong professor recs is BS who cares
18:44
i hope
18:44
they can see when u cancel ur score right
18:44
yeah
18:44
thats so embarrising
18:44
fuck me
18:44
i hope i am remembering it way worse
18:44
lmao yeah i think in most circumstances you shouldn’t cancel cuz they might assume the score is worse than it was
18:45
remembering the lsat?
18:45
yur
18:45
I’ve been doing that too you’ll be fine
18:45
i just saw that some kids a year below me in high school are starting at good ass schools too fuckkk
18:46
what are good ass schools to you?
18:46
do u have a dream school?
18:46
well i saw one is at fordham and one is at upenn and ik fordham isnt t14 but its better than temple and villanova
18:47
dream is duke
18:47
ooh interesting choice why Duke?
18:48
i got into fordham and so did the dumbass I was dating for like two months it’s not that hard
18:48
by which I mean if they let him in I don’t trust their standards
18:49
my dad went to duke law so i have been a fan forever
18:49
Duke is fun. I took a trip there when I was 19 or so. Really good time when I was a young rapscallion.
18:49
and ik i just dont think i gave myself enough time for a guaranteed 170+ performance
18:49
I didnt see if anyone answered my UGA question. Did anyone answer it?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.