Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

antitransfer Laws

Read a random definition: bill

A quick definition of antitransfer Laws:

Antitransfer laws are rules that punish people who give away or sell their assets for less than they are worth in order to qualify for government benefits like Medicaid or SSI. These laws have a specific time frame during which the transfer must have occurred, called a look-back period. If someone is found to have transferred assets for less than fair market value during this time, they may become temporarily ineligible for benefits. However, if they can prove that the transfer was not done to qualify for benefits, they may still be able to keep their eligibility.

A more thorough explanation:

Antitransfer laws, also known as transfer of assets rules, are laws that penalize individuals who dispose of their assets for less than fair market value in order to become eligible for public benefits such as Medicaid or SSI. These laws are in place to prevent people from taking advantage of the system and to ensure that those who truly need the benefits receive them.

For example, if an individual transfers their assets to a family member for less than fair market value and then applies for Medicaid, they may be temporarily ineligible for certain medical benefits. Similarly, if an individual transfers assets for less than fair market value and then applies for SSI benefits, they may also become temporarily ineligible.

Antitransfer laws typically have a look-back period, which is a specific time frame during which the transfer must have occurred. If an individual can prove that the transfer was made for a purpose other than to qualify for benefits, they may still be eligible for those benefits.

Overall, antitransfer laws are designed to prevent people from taking advantage of the system and to ensure that those who truly need the benefits receive them.

John is a senior citizen who has been living in a nursing home for several years. He wants to apply for Medicaid to help cover the cost of his care, but he knows that he has too many assets to qualify. In an attempt to become eligible, John transfers ownership of his house to his son for a fraction of its fair market value. However, because of antitransfer laws, John may be temporarily ineligible for Medicaid benefits.

This example illustrates how antitransfer laws can prevent individuals from disposing of their assets for less than fair market value in order to become eligible for public benefits. By penalizing these types of transfers, antitransfer laws help ensure that those who truly need the benefits receive them.

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) | antitrust

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
lilypadfrog
8:12
hi shawties
lilypadfrog
8:16
who’s getting into a law school today raise your hand
jackfrost11770
8:28
I sure hope so at this point
lilypadfrog
8:28
woooo
lilypadfrog
8:28
jackfrost for law school
jackfrost11770
8:29
LILYPADFROG FOR LAW SCHOOL
jackfrost11770
8:29
I really just love how now there's an executive order that says I don't exist as a person
jackfrost11770
8:29
Do I not have to pay taxes now? Loans? What now
lilypadfrog
8:34
you should probably assume this means your law school will be free
GreyCeaselessMammoth
8:34
i love that there's an executive order that we're all female now
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.