Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

appellee

Read a random definition: shilling

A quick definition of appellee:

Appellee: The appellee is the person or group that someone is appealing against. They defend themselves against the appeal. The appellant is the person who is unhappy with a decision and wants to change it by going to a higher court. The appellee is also called the respondent. For example, if someone sues another person and wins, the person who lost can file an appeal. In this case, the person who lost is the appellant, and the person who won is the appellee. If the roles are reversed, the person who won becomes the appellant, and the person who lost becomes the appellee.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The appellee is the party against whom an appeal is filed and who responds to and defends the appeal. It is also known as the respondent. The appellant, on the other hand, is the party who appeals a lower court's decision to a higher court.

Example: Let's say that Person A sues Person B and wins the case. If Person B is not happy with the outcome, they can file an appeal. In this scenario, Person B becomes the appellant, and Person A becomes the appellee. Person B is appealing the decision made by the lower court, and Person A is defending the decision.

If Person B wins the appeal, the roles are reversed. Person A can file an appeal, and Person B becomes the appellee, while Person A becomes the appellant.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the appellee is the party that responds to and defends the appeal. In the first scenario, Person A is the appellee because they are defending the lower court's decision. In the second scenario, Person B becomes the appellee because they are defending the decision made by the higher court.

appellate procedure | applicable exclusion amount

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.