Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

applicable exclusion amount

Read a random definition: database

A quick definition of applicable exclusion amount:

The applicable exclusion amount is the amount of gifts and estate transfers that are exempt from an individual's gift and estate taxes. This means that a person can give or transfer up to a certain amount without having to pay taxes on it. The amount changes over time and can be used on one gift, split between gifts and estate transfers, or used entirely on estates. There are also exceptions for gifts to charity or education expenses, as well as spousal exceptions. However, Congress has debated reducing this amount, so it may change in the future. Examples of the applicable exclusion amount in practice include giving gifts to children or spouses without incurring taxes, or using both a person's and their spouse's exclusion amount to transfer assets to their children tax-free.

A more thorough explanation:

The applicable exclusion amount, also known as unified credit, is the total amount of gifts and estate transfers that are exempted from an individual's gift and estate taxes. This exclusion can be used on one gift, partially on gifts and partially on estate transfers, or entirely on estates. It is a contested area of tax law that changes frequently and creates a significant exception to the approximately 40% Federal estate tax.

Every U.S. citizen has an applicable exclusion amount for all gifts made inter vivos or estate transfers at death. Some gifts do not count towards the amount, such as to charity or paying someone's education expenses. There are also spousal exceptions that allow free transfers to the spouses without counting against the individual's lifetime exclusion amount, and a spouse can transfer what exclusion amount is not used in their lifetime to their spouse upon testacy.

The amount has ranged from less than $1,000,000 in 2000 to over $11,000,000 in 2018. In 2011, Congress set the amount at $5,000,000 with increases every year to adjust for inflation, and this method lasted for a few years until the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 added $5,000,000 to the 2011 amount until 2026. After adjusting for inflation, the cap was set at $11,180,000 for the year 2018, and the cap is set to increase every year for inflation until reverting back to the prior $5,000,000 cap plus inflation. However, Congress has already debated multiple times reducing this cap since 2017, and if history serves, Congress will likely change the exclusion amount before it reverts back in 2026 to the 2011 system.

John gives his three children as a gift $4,000,000 each during his lifetime, and John has $10,000,000 pass to his children through his estate. If the applicable exclusion amount was $12,000,000, the lifetime gifts of $4,000,000 would not be subject to estate tax because they would not go over the $12,000,000 exclusion amount. However, all of John's exclusion amount would be used up on the lifetime gifts, and the $10,000,000 estate would face estate taxes of around $4,000,000. This example illustrates how the applicable exclusion amount can be used on lifetime gifts and estate transfers.

Sammy gives her daughter $20,000,000 upon graduating law school, and later, Sammy gives her daughter $10,000,000 more upon getting married. If the applicable exclusion amount is $12,000,000, Sammy would face gift taxes on $8,000,000 of the first gift and all of the second, resulting in about $8,000,000 in gift taxes. This example illustrates how the applicable exclusion amount can be exceeded, resulting in gift taxes.

Rachel and Ross are married, but Ross dies leaving $15,000,000 to Rachel without using any of his exclusion amount during his life. If the exclusion amount is $12,000,000, Rachel could use both her and Ross's exclusion amount to transfer $24,000,000 to their son without amassing any estate tax. This example illustrates how the spousal exception can be used to transfer more assets without incurring estate tax.

appellee | appointees

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
as far as i know, that information is simply for data collection purposes
^
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.