Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

APR

Read a random definition: abettor

A quick definition of APR:

APR: APR stands for Annual Percentage Rate. It is a yearly rate that shows how much it costs to borrow money or earn interest on an investment. This rate includes the interest charged and any other fees associated with the loan or investment. To calculate APR, you multiply the interest rate by the number of payment periods in a year. Basically, APR tells you how much you will pay for borrowing money or how much you will earn on an investment each year.

A more thorough explanation:

An annual percentage rate (APR) is the yearly cost of borrowing money or earning interest on an investment. It includes the interest rate and any other fees associated with the transaction. APR is expressed as a percentage and is calculated by multiplying the interest rate per payment period by the number of payment periods in a year.

If you borrow $1,000 at an interest rate of 10% per year, the APR would be 10%. However, if there are additional fees associated with the loan, such as an origination fee of $50, the APR would be slightly higher than 10%.

Another example would be if you invest $1,000 in a savings account that earns 5% interest per year. The APR would be 5%, but if there are any fees associated with the account, such as a monthly maintenance fee of $5, the APR would be slightly lower than 5%.

These examples illustrate how APR takes into account not only the interest rate, but also any additional fees associated with the transaction. It provides a more accurate representation of the true cost of borrowing or earning interest.

appurtenant | arbiter

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.