Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Arkansas rule

Read a random definition: complete integration

A quick definition of Arkansas rule:

Arkansas rule: When someone borrows money and puts up something valuable as collateral, like a car or a house, the thing they put up is assumed to be worth at least as much as the amount they borrowed. If the lender wants to take the collateral and sell it to get their money back, they have to prove that the thing they're selling isn't worth enough to cover the loan. This is called the Arkansas rule.

A more thorough explanation:

ARKANSAS RULE

The Arkansas rule is a principle in secured transactions that states that the collateral used to secure a loan is assumed to be worth at least as much as the loan's balance. The creditor has the responsibility to prove that selling the collateral would not satisfy the loan amount.

For instance, if a borrower takes out a loan of $10,000 and uses their car as collateral, the Arkansas rule assumes that the car is worth at least $10,000. If the borrower defaults on the loan, the creditor must prove that selling the car would not cover the loan amount.

Another example is if a business takes out a loan and uses their inventory as collateral. The Arkansas rule assumes that the inventory is worth at least the amount of the loan. If the business defaults on the loan, the creditor must prove that selling the inventory would not cover the loan amount.

These examples illustrate how the Arkansas rule protects borrowers by ensuring that creditors cannot take advantage of them by undervaluing their collateral. It also places the burden of proof on the creditor to show that the collateral is not worth the loan amount.

aristodemocracy | arma

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.