Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

arrest warrant

Read a random definition: validity search

A quick definition of arrest warrant:

An arrest warrant is a paper that a judge or magistrate gives to the police. It says that they can take someone who is accused of a crime to jail. The judge or magistrate only gives the warrant if they have a good reason to think the person did something wrong. The warrant tells the person being arrested what they are being charged with. It's important because it makes sure that the police don't arrest people for no reason.

A more thorough explanation:

An arrest warrant is a legal document issued by a judge or magistrate that allows the police to take someone accused of a crime into custody. The warrant is issued only if there is probable cause, which means there is enough evidence to suggest that the person has committed a crime.

The purpose of an arrest warrant is to protect people from unlawful arrests under the Fourth Amendment. It also gives the person being arrested notice of the charges against them.

While an arrest warrant is preferred, it is not always required to make a lawful arrest.

Example 1: A police officer has evidence that a person has committed a robbery. The officer presents the evidence to a judge, who issues an arrest warrant for the suspect. The police can then use the warrant to take the suspect into custody.

Example 2: A police officer sees a person committing a crime in plain sight. The officer can make an immediate arrest without an arrest warrant.

These examples illustrate how an arrest warrant is used to ensure that arrests are lawful and that people are given notice of the charges against them.

arrest | arson

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.