Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Fourth Amendment

Read a random definition: recapitalization

A quick definition of Fourth Amendment:

The Fourth Amendment is a part of the US Constitution that protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. This means that the government cannot search your things or take your stuff without a good reason and a warrant. However, there are some exceptions to this rule, like if you give the government permission to search or if there is an emergency. If the government violates your Fourth Amendment rights, any evidence they find cannot be used against you in court. The Fourth Amendment also applies to electronic devices like computers and phones. People on probation or parole also have Fourth Amendment rights, but there are some special rules for them.

A more thorough explanation:

The Fourth Amendment is a part of the U.S. Constitution that protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. It states that people have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, and that no warrants shall be issued without probable cause and a specific description of what is being searched or seized.

For example, if a police officer wants to search someone's home, they need a warrant that specifically describes what they are looking for and why they believe it is there. If they do not have a warrant, they can only search if the person gives them permission or if there is an emergency situation.

The Fourth Amendment also requires that any evidence obtained through an illegal search or seizure cannot be used in court. This is known as the exclusionary rule.

There are some exceptions to the Fourth Amendment, such as when there is consent to search, when there is probable cause and an emergency situation, or when something is in plain view.

Overall, the Fourth Amendment is meant to protect people's privacy and prevent the government from abusing its power to search and seize without good reason.

Fourteenth Amendment | framing

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.