Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

assets per descent

Read a random definition: EAT

A quick definition of assets per descent:

Assets are things that someone owns and that have value. They can include things like money, property, equipment, and even goodwill. When someone dies, their assets may be passed down to their heirs, and these assets are called assets by descent. Some assets are easy to turn into cash, like a savings account, while others, like a house, may take more time and effort to sell.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Assets per descent refer to the portion of an estate that passes to an heir and is enough to charge the heir with the deceased person's specialty debts.

Examples: When a person dies, their assets are distributed among their heirs. Assets per descent are the assets that are passed down to the heirs and are enough to cover the deceased person's debts. For example, if a person dies and leaves behind a house worth $500,000 and a car worth $20,000, and their debts amount to $200,000, the assets per descent would be $320,000 ($500,000 + $20,000 - $200,000).

Explanation: Assets per descent are the assets that are inherited by the heirs and are enough to cover the deceased person's debts. These assets are distributed among the heirs according to the laws of inheritance. The heirs are responsible for paying off the deceased person's debts using these assets. The example illustrates how assets per descent are calculated by subtracting the deceased person's debts from the total value of the assets that are passed down to the heirs.

assets in hand | asset under management

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.