Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

attestation clause

Read a random definition: housebreaking

A quick definition of attestation clause:

An attestation clause is a part of a legal document, like a will, that is signed by witnesses and explains how the document was made. It helps to prove that the document was made correctly and that the signatures are real. Even if the witnesses don't remember everything about the document or have passed away, the attestation clause can still be used as evidence. However, if there is evidence that the witnesses didn't tell the truth or didn't read the clause before signing, the attestation clause won't be helpful anymore.

A more thorough explanation:

An attestation clause is a provision found at the end of a legal document, such as a will, that is signed by witnesses. It confirms that the document was executed properly and meets all the legal requirements. The clause serves as evidence of the facts within the document and can be used to prove its validity.

For example, in the context of a will, an attestation clause confirms that the will was signed by the testator (the person making the will) in the presence of witnesses who also signed the document. This creates a presumption that the will was executed properly and that the signatures are genuine.

While attestation clauses are not necessary for the valid execution of a will, they are customary and can be helpful in avoiding disputes over the validity of the document. However, the presumption created by an attestation clause can be challenged with evidence that shows the witnesses did not follow the proper procedures or that the information in the clause is incorrect.

For example, if it can be shown that the witnesses did not actually witness the testator signing the will or that they did not read the attestation clause before signing it, the presumption of proper execution created by the clause will be destroyed.

attestation | attestator

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:38
@Law-Shark: they didn't say we had to go? and if they are willing to buy rooms for a bunch of people. they sent me a res because I was over 50 miles away but I didn't even ask for one
16:42
@Law-Shark: also kind of rude for you to be speaking to me like that, the event started at 9am and I had to wakeup at 4 to drive in. i was tired and couldn't even check in until 4pm if I wanted to so I just drove back. it's unprofessional to offer it the night before and not the day after. they also didn't feed us actual food and we were there until 2pm.
Law-Shark
16:43
The fact you didn't think a reservation in your name is something you need to be responsible for and cancel if you weren't going to show up to by sending a simple email is absolutely iresponsible.
16:43
I didn't make a reservation tho?
16:44
Yeah, I would have definitely gone to the hotel if I knew they booked a room for me. At the very least, it would be proper to show up personally and explain your extraneous circumstances
Law-Shark
16:44
Nah but it's in your name. I went to an ASD. I asked the school for an extra night and they gave it to me. You just need to plan things better.
Law-Shark
16:45
This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain.
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
Does anyone have experience getting their aid package reconsidered at WashU? How long does it take to hear back after sending the form?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.