Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Audio Home Recording Act

Read a random definition: homestead exemption

A quick definition of Audio Home Recording Act:

The Audio Home Recording Act is a law that was created in 1992 to stop people from getting in trouble for making copies of music using digital technology. Companies that make digital recording devices have to pay money to the people who own the rights to the music, and they have to make sure their devices have special security features. These features let people make copies of music from the original source, but not from copies of the music. We use the abbreviation AHRA to talk about this law.

A more thorough explanation:

The Audio Home Recording Act is a federal law that was passed in 1992 to prevent copyright infringement lawsuits related to digital-audio technology. The law requires manufacturers of digital recording devices to pay royalties on sales of the devices and related media, and to build security mechanisms into each device.

These security mechanisms allow the owner of a digital-recording device to make a copy from the original medium, but not to make a copy from the copy. This means that people can make personal copies of their music or other audio recordings, but they cannot make copies to sell or distribute without permission from the copyright owner.

For example, if you buy a CD and want to make a copy of it to listen to in your car, you can do so using a digital recording device that complies with the Audio Home Recording Act. However, you cannot make copies of the CD to sell or give away to others without permission from the copyright owner.

auctor in rem suam | audiovisual work

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.