Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

audiovisual work

Read a random definition: echevin

A quick definition of audiovisual work:

An audiovisual work is a type of creation that combines both sound and images. It can be a movie, a lecture with pictures, or any other presentation that uses both sound and visuals. It is protected by copyright law, which means that the person who creates it has the exclusive right to use and distribute it. Other types of works that can be protected by copyright include books, music, and art.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An audiovisual work is a type of work that consists of related images presented in a series, usually with the aid of a machine, and accompanied by sound. It is an original expression in fixed or tangible form that may be entitled to common-law or statutory copyright protection. Examples of audiovisual works include lectures illustrated with a filmstrip or a movie with a soundtrack.

Example: A documentary film about climate change is an example of an audiovisual work. It consists of a series of related images, such as footage of melting glaciers and rising sea levels, presented with the aid of a machine, such as a projector or a television, and accompanied by sound, such as narration or music. The film is an original expression in fixed or tangible form that may be entitled to copyright protection.

Explanation: The example illustrates the definition of an audiovisual work by showing how it consists of related images presented in a series with sound. The documentary film about climate change is an original expression that may be entitled to copyright protection because it is an audiovisual work.

Audio Home Recording Act | audita querela

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.