Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

avizandum

Read a random definition: cause-of-action estoppel

A quick definition of avizandum:

Term: AVIZANDUM

Definition: In Scots law, avizandum means to take a case or part of it from the public court to the private consideration of the judge for deliberation and advisement. Essentially, it is when the judge takes time to think about the case before giving an opinion.

A more thorough explanation:

Avizandum (av-i-zan-dəm) is a Latin term used in Scots law to refer to the process of deliberation or advisement. When a judge makes avizandum with a case, they take it from the public court to their private consideration.

For example, if a judge needs more time to consider a case, they may make avizandum with it. During this time, they will review the evidence and arguments presented in court before giving their opinion.

Another example is when a judge needs to consult with other legal experts before making a decision. In this case, they may make avizandum with the case to seek advice and guidance.

These examples illustrate how avizandum is used in Scots law to describe the process of taking a case from the public court to the private consideration of a judge. It allows the judge to carefully review the evidence and arguments before giving their opinion or seeking advice from other legal experts.

a vinculo matrimonii | avoid

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.