Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

baby-brokering

Read a random definition: MDA

A quick definition of baby-brokering:

Definition: Baby-brokering, also known as baby-selling, is when someone exchanges money or something else of value for a child. This is illegal in all states. However, it is not considered baby-selling if adoptive parents pay for pregnancy-related expenses for the birth mother. Baby-brokering is also called baby-bartering.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Baby-brokering, also known as baby-selling, refers to the exchange of money or something else of value for a child. This practice is illegal in all states and is not considered legal for prospective adoptive parents to pay money to a birth mother for pregnancy-related expenses.

Examples: A woman offers to sell her newborn baby to a couple for a large sum of money. A man promises to find a baby for a couple in exchange for a fee. Both of these scenarios would be considered baby-brokering and are illegal.

Explanation: Baby-brokering involves the buying and selling of children, which is a serious crime. It is important to note that paying for pregnancy-related expenses, such as medical bills and living expenses, is not considered baby-brokering as long as it is done legally and ethically. The examples illustrate how baby-brokering involves the exchange of money or something else of value for a child, which is illegal and unethical.

baby-bartering | Baby Doe

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.