Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

badgering the witness

Read a random definition: product test

A quick definition of badgering the witness:

Badgering the witness is when a lawyer asks a lot of mean or repetitive questions to a witness during a trial. This can make it hard for the witness to answer truthfully and can be distracting. If the opposing lawyer thinks the questions are too mean or distracting, they can object and ask the judge to stop it. Sometimes the judge will agree and tell the lawyer to stop. Even if the judge doesn't agree, it's not a good idea for a lawyer to badger a witness because it can make the jury not like them.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Badgering the witness is when a lawyer asks a witness too many questions that are argumentative, rude, or repetitive during cross-examination. This can be distracting and prevent the witness from giving accurate information.

Example: If a lawyer repeatedly asks a witness the same question in a loud and aggressive tone, such as "Are you lying to us?" or "Why can't you remember?", this could be considered badgering the witness. Another example is when a lawyer asks a witness to make conclusions from the facts instead of just stating the facts, such as "So, you must have been the one who stole the money, right?"

Explanation: Badgering the witness can be disruptive and prevent the witness from giving accurate information. Lawyers should ask questions in a respectful and clear manner to get the facts they need. When a lawyer badgers a witness, it can make the witness feel uncomfortable or defensive, which can affect their testimony. It is important for lawyers to avoid badgering the witness to ensure a fair trial.

bad faith | bail

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.