Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

beg the question

Read a random definition: sake and soke

A quick definition of beg the question:

Begging the question is when someone makes an argument that assumes the thing they are trying to prove is already true. This is a mistake because it doesn't actually prove anything. It's like saying "I'm the best because I'm the best." This kind of argument can be tricky because it might sound convincing, but it's not really saying anything. People sometimes use this kind of argument without realizing it, or to try to trick others into agreeing with them. The term "begs the question" comes from a famous philosopher named Aristotle.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Begging the question is a logical fallacy in which an argument’s premises assume the truth of the conclusion. This means that the argument is circular and does not provide any real evidence to support the conclusion. It can be looked at as a form of circular reasoning.

For example, if someone says, "I am a good person because I always do the right thing," they are begging the question. The argument assumes that the person always does the right thing, which is the conclusion they are trying to prove.

Another example is, "The Bible is true because it says it is the word of God." This argument assumes that the Bible is the word of God, which is the conclusion they are trying to prove.

Despite their nature as fallacies, arguments that beg the question can be persuasive to parties unaware of the fallacy or who already agree with the conclusion. This is because the argument may sound convincing, even though it is not based on any real evidence.

In common day-to-day speech, “begs the question” is often misused to mean “raises the question”, regardless of whether or not the question raised is an assumption of the statement that raises it.

The term “begs the question” originally comes from the works of Aristotle.

bearer paper | belief

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
20:28
ok
20:30
@c0bra1: damn right! - GI Joe
21:14
Don't loose hope frens. It aint over, till its over, brother. -Hoya Saxa
Hey if I am on a bunch of waitlists am I screwed ?
21:39
@AlejandroAI405: Not for certain. You can get off the wait list, however it can be difficult. Would you consider reapplying next year or/and retaking the LSAT? You may drastically increase your choices/outcome(s)/and possibly get a scholarship
stay strong soldiers
10:09
What is up saturday morning gunners
10:09
@llama: RandR is a fucking joke, dont do it alejandro AI lmfao
noreaster
11:06
I genuinely do think being a reapplicant has some influence on a school’s perception of you, like we didn’t want this person before so why would we want them now? If you apply to only a couple schools your first cycle and then reapply with a higher LSAT and apply more broadly you will prob have good odds at the schools you didn’t apply to before
11:24
LMFAO why wait a year to go form UGA to chicago? You make the same biglaw salary lmfao you can get the same elite pi if you finish high, which you should if you are capable of getting chicago with a r and r. This means you advocate them not earning what they could over 4 years - 90k and study then 3 years of law or 3 years of law and then 260k salary? lmfao r and r only makes sense for FC
11:25
If someone applied with a 155 and can get a 170, a lot diff than a 168 hoping for a 172 and wasting a whole year for that
11:25
Oh i know i know i know
11:26
BUt if you want 171 r and r to get a 176+ for top FC at the top schools? okay. Everything else? Take your t25.
11:26
Scholarship dollars? Tuition + 90k income is the same or slightly less than the big law salary, but without a year of career progression.
11:27
It is not a smart move to r and r, long story short, despite what people who want you to pay for essay review and lsat tutor and lsat tutor service say
noreaster
11:58
The other point I would make is that with medians rising your 3.92 GPA might be above median at your dream school one year and below the next
13:20
Both of you make valid points, but if you do not get off the W/L your only options are to R&R or just not pursue. So yea if it makes sense and you can go this year, it may be better than R&R in hopes of better prospects next yr. the devil you know is better than the angel you don't where devil is this cycle and angel is next cycel
i don't think reapplying is going to hurt you from a previously WL/denied school
just make sure you're coming with new things on your resume. maybe a higher lsat or some work experience. a school may not of wanted you this cycle, but if you come back with stronger stats, you're gonna be what they might be looking for.
overall, i'd say work on boosting your lsat though!!
14:18
These decision times are so long, its crazy how I have to put in a deposit without knowing a couple of decisions
14:19
"rolling admissions" will haunt me forever
noreaster
11:05
good way of showing fluctuations over time
MrThickRopes
11:11
Easter waves TD?
Real
checking anyways
17:54
@MrThickRopes: not likely
MrThickRopes
19:01
You was right
Jacobdoeshisbest
19:17
Anyone here go to ookla for undergrad?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.