Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Berry rule

Read a random definition: VA

A quick definition of Berry rule:

The Berry rule is a legal principle that says if someone wants a new trial because they found new evidence, they have to prove four things. First, the evidence has to be new and the person didn't know about it during the trial. Second, the evidence has to be important and not just repeating what was already said. Third, the evidence has to be strong enough to make the person not guilty. Fourth, the person can't have been lazy and not tried to find the evidence before. This rule comes from a court case called Berry v. State in 1851.

A more thorough explanation:

The Berry Rule is a legal doctrine that applies to a defendant who wants to request a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. To be successful, the defendant must prove four things:

  1. The evidence is newly discovered and was not known to the defendant at the time of the trial.
  2. The evidence is material, meaning it is important and relevant to the case, rather than just repeating what was already presented in court.
  3. The evidence will likely result in an acquittal, meaning the defendant would be found not guilty if the evidence was presented at a new trial.
  4. The defendant was not at fault for not discovering the evidence earlier, meaning they were diligent in their efforts to find it.

For example, let's say a person was convicted of a crime based on the testimony of a witness. After the trial, the defendant discovers that the witness had a history of lying and had lied in other cases. If the defendant wants to request a new trial based on this newly discovered evidence, they would need to prove that the evidence was not known to them at the time of the trial, that it is material to the case, that it would likely result in an acquittal, and that they were not at fault for not discovering it earlier.

Berne Union | Bertillon system

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 3 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.