Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Berry rule

Read a random definition: Steward of Chiltern Hundreds

A quick definition of Berry rule:

The Berry rule is a legal principle that says if someone wants a new trial because they found new evidence, they have to prove four things. First, the evidence has to be new and the person didn't know about it during the trial. Second, the evidence has to be important and not just repeating what was already said. Third, the evidence has to be strong enough to make the person not guilty. Fourth, the person can't have been lazy and not tried to find the evidence before. This rule comes from a court case called Berry v. State in 1851.

A more thorough explanation:

The Berry Rule is a legal doctrine that applies to a defendant who wants to request a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. To be successful, the defendant must prove four things:

  1. The evidence is newly discovered and was not known to the defendant at the time of the trial.
  2. The evidence is material, meaning it is important and relevant to the case, rather than just repeating what was already presented in court.
  3. The evidence will likely result in an acquittal, meaning the defendant would be found not guilty if the evidence was presented at a new trial.
  4. The defendant was not at fault for not discovering the evidence earlier, meaning they were diligent in their efforts to find it.

For example, let's say a person was convicted of a crime based on the testimony of a witness. After the trial, the defendant discovers that the witness had a history of lying and had lied in other cases. If the defendant wants to request a new trial based on this newly discovered evidence, they would need to prove that the evidence was not known to them at the time of the trial, that it is material to the case, that it would likely result in an acquittal, and that they were not at fault for not discovering it earlier.

Berne Union | Bertillon system

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.