LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

bestiality

Read a random definition: rank and file

A quick definition of bestiality:

Bestiality is when a person does sexual things with an animal. It's against the law in most places and people who do it can get in trouble. It's also against the law to help someone else do it, let it happen on your property, watch it happen, or take pictures or videos of it. Only four states in the United States don't have laws against bestiality.

A more thorough explanation:

Bestiality is when a person has sex with an animal. It is against the law in most states in the United States. It is also a crime to help someone else have sex with an animal, to let someone have sex with an animal on your property, to watch someone have sex with an animal, or to take pictures or videos of someone having sex with an animal.

For example, if someone helps their friend have sex with a dog, they are committing bestiality. Or if someone lets their neighbor have sex with their horse, they are also committing bestiality. Even just watching someone have sex with an animal is against the law.

These laws exist to protect animals from being harmed and to prevent people from engaging in harmful and dangerous behavior. It is important to treat animals with respect and not use them for sexual purposes.

best interests of the child | beyond a reasonable doubt

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

texaslawhopefully

22:30

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:31

yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca

renard99

22:31

@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all

texaslawhopefully

22:31

Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex

Eggan

22:31

waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:32

^^^^ truuuuuu

Eggan

22:32

there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol

Eggan

22:32

personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:32

i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions

texaslawhopefully

22:32

Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)

Eggan

22:33

when tex goes to ithaca i want to come

Dkk

22:34

Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:35

damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:35

and it was a lil baby noodle cup

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:35

vvv hungry

Eggan

22:36

curry tonkatsu so yummeh

Eggan

22:36

whats even open rn? pizza?

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:36

CTB is it i think

Eggan

22:37

is collegetown pizza not open

Eggan

22:37

i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant

Dkk

22:48

Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.

JeremyFragrance

22:54

agreed

texaslawhopefully

22:55

This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/

Dkk

23:01

I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

23:02

ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

23:02

i am not that sympathetic to him

Dkk

23:04

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.

Dkk

23:05

Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.

texaslawhopefully

23:05

@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.

Dkk

23:06

Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.