Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

bifactoral obligation

Read a random definition: paydown

A quick definition of bifactoral obligation:

A bifactoral obligation is a type of obligation that involves two parties who are both responsible for fulfilling the obligation. This means that both parties have a duty to perform certain actions or meet certain requirements in order to fulfill the obligation. For example, in a contract between two parties, both parties may have obligations to fulfill in order to complete the contract.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A bifactoral obligation is a type of obligation that involves two parties who are both responsible for fulfilling the obligation. This can include legal or moral obligations.

Example: A common example of a bifactoral obligation is a contract between two parties. Both parties are obligated to fulfill their respective duties as outlined in the contract. If one party fails to fulfill their obligation, the other party may have legal recourse to seek damages or other remedies.

Another example of a bifactoral obligation is a marriage. Both partners have a moral and legal obligation to support and care for each other. If one partner fails to fulfill their obligation, it can lead to marital problems or even divorce.

These examples illustrate how a bifactoral obligation involves two parties who are both responsible for fulfilling the obligation. It is important for both parties to understand their obligations and fulfill them to avoid any negative consequences.

biens | bigamus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.