Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Blonder–Tongue doctrine

Read a random definition: capitalis

A quick definition of Blonder–Tongue doctrine:

The Blonder-Tongue Doctrine is a rule that says if a patent owner has already had a court case about their patent, they can't have another court case about the same thing with a different person. It's like if you already played a game with your friend and decided who won, you can't play the same game with a different friend and try to win again.

A more thorough explanation:

The Blonder-Tongue Doctrine is a legal principle that applies to patent law. It states that a patent holder is prevented from relitigating an issue that has already been decided in a previous court case. This is known as collateral estoppel.

For example, if a patent holder sues a company for infringing on their patent and loses the case, they cannot sue another company for the same infringement based on the same argument. The issue of infringement has already been decided in the previous case, and the patent holder is barred from relitigating it.

The Blonder-Tongue Doctrine helps to prevent patent holders from using the legal system to harass or intimidate companies that they believe are infringing on their patents. It also helps to promote consistency and finality in court decisions.

block policy | blood

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.