Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

boilerplate

Read a random definition: Presently exercisable power of appointment

A quick definition of boilerplate:

Boilerplate: When people write legal documents, they often use the same words over and over again. These words are called "boilerplate." They are like a template that can be used in many different documents. Sometimes, people don't even think about what the words mean. They just use them because they are standard. However, if there is a problem, the words in the boilerplate might not be helpful. That's because they are usually written to protect the person who wrote the document, not the person who is reading it.

A more thorough explanation:

Boilerplate is a term used to describe standard language in a legal document that is used in all similar documents. It is like a template that is used over and over again. This language is often found in contracts and is not specific to any particular situation.

For example, a lease agreement may have a boilerplate clause that outlines the responsibilities of the landlord and tenant. This clause is the same in all lease agreements and is not tailored to the specific property or situation.

It is important to note that boilerplate language is usually interpreted in favor of the party who did not write the document. This means that if there is a dispute, the party who did not draft the document may have an advantage.

Overall, boilerplate language is a way to save time and effort when drafting legal documents. However, it is important to understand the implications of using this language and to make sure that it is appropriate for the specific situation.

boiler room | bona fide

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.