Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

bona fide occupational qualification

Read a random definition: entire-contract clause

A quick definition of bona fide occupational qualification:

A bona fide occupational qualification is a job requirement that may discriminate against a certain group of people, but is necessary for the job to be done properly. For example, a job that requires a certain physical ability or language proficiency. This type of qualification is allowed under the law, even if it goes against anti-discrimination laws, as long as it is essential for the job. It is abbreviated as BFOQ.

A more thorough explanation:

A bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) is a job requirement that may discriminate against a protected class, such as sex, religion, or national origin, but is necessary for the job. This type of qualification is not illegal under federal employment-discrimination laws.

For example, a religious organization may require that its leaders be of a certain faith, even if it means excluding people of other religions. This is considered a BFOQ because the job requires someone who shares the same beliefs as the organization.

Another example is a modeling agency that only hires female models for women's clothing. This is considered a BFOQ because the job requires someone of a specific gender to accurately represent the clothing being sold.

Overall, a BFOQ is a defense against discrimination claims when the job requires a specific characteristic that is necessary for the job. It is important to note that the BFOQ must be related to an essential job duty and considered reasonably necessary to the operation of the particular business.

bona fide judgment creditor | bona fide operation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.