Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

brevitatis causa

Read a random definition: spontaneous crime

A quick definition of brevitatis causa:

Term: BREVITATIS CAUSA

Definition: BREVITATIS CAUSA is a Latin phrase used in Scots law to mean "for the sake of brevity." It is often used in legal documents to indicate that another document has been referred to but not fully quoted.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Brevitatis causa is a Latin term used in Scots law to mean "for the sake of brevity." It is often used in legal documents to indicate that another document has been referenced but not fully quoted.

Example: In a legal contract, a clause may state "The terms and conditions of the previous agreement, as set forth in Exhibit A, are incorporated herein by reference, brevitatis causa."

This means that the terms and conditions of Exhibit A are included in the current contract, but for the sake of brevity, they are not fully quoted in the contract itself.

Another example: A court document may state "The defendant's prior criminal record, as detailed in the attached report, is incorporated herein by reference, brevitatis causa."

This means that the report detailing the defendant's criminal record is included in the court document, but for the sake of brevity, it is not fully quoted in the document itself.

brevi manu | brev. sel.

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 1 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.