Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

bucket shop

Read a random definition: ad diem

A quick definition of bucket shop:

A bucket shop is a type of brokerage firm that steals money or assets from traders or investors during the brokering process. This is done through illegal practices such as selling an asset for more than it actually costs and keeping the difference. Historically, bucket shops were gambling operations that allowed people to bet on stocks and other markets, but they were eventually made illegal. While they had negative effects, they also helped make investing accessible to ordinary citizens and transformed the U.S. economy.

A more thorough explanation:

A bucket shop is a type of brokerage firm that engages in illegal activities during the trading process. This can involve stealing money or other assets from traders or investors. One common method is for the firm to sell an asset to the customer for more than it actually costs and keep the difference.

For example, if a stock is trading at $50, the bucket shop might tell a customer that it is trading at $55 and then sell the stock to the customer for $55. The bucket shop would then keep the extra $5 per share for itself.

Historically, bucket shops were gambling operations that allowed people to bet on stocks and other markets. These operations were illegal and often targeted inexperienced, working-class citizens. The dealers would leverage the betting of gamblers, increasing the lure of quick money and downfalls soon thereafter.

While bucket shops helped usher in an age of ordinary citizens being able to invest in markets, they were eventually outlawed in most states. Today, bucket shops are illegal brokerage firms that deceive traders or investors during the brokering process.

Brown v. Board of Education (1954) | building and loan association

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.