Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Bush doctrine

Read a random definition: bi-scot

A quick definition of Bush doctrine:

The Bush Doctrine was a policy announced by President George W. Bush after the September 11, 2001 attacks. It stated that countries that support terrorists will be treated as terrorists themselves and may be attacked first. This means that if a country is found to be helping terrorists, they could be attacked by the United States.

A more thorough explanation:

The Bush Doctrine is a policy that was announced by President George W. Bush after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The policy states that nations that harbor terrorists will be treated as terrorists themselves and may be subject to a first-strike strategy. This means that if a country is found to be supporting or harboring terrorists, the United States may attack that country without warning.

For example, in 2003, the United States invaded Iraq, citing the country's alleged support for terrorism and possession of weapons of mass destruction. This was seen as an application of the Bush Doctrine, as the United States believed that Iraq was a threat to national security and needed to be dealt with preemptively.

The Bush Doctrine represents a significant departure from traditional international law, which emphasizes the principle of sovereign equality among nations. Under this principle, all nations are considered equal and have the right to self-defense. However, the Bush Doctrine suggests that some nations may be more equal than others, and that the United States has the right to take unilateral action to protect its interests.

bursting-bubble theory | business agent

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:44
My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:46
Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night
7:55
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning
7:56
Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week
soapy
8:48
UMN under review! As predicted, decisions are gonna come out early December
Minus those random R decisions from UMN yesterday though right? I wonder what happened there. I don’t think I’ve seen a school start the season out with anything but As on here
almost all of my apps have been UR for 6 weeks at this point I feel exhausted waiting for them to finish
Irvine is being snobby and wont start any review until end of Nov.
Yeah, it’s tough. I’m distracting myself by playing good video games after work :)
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.