Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

but-for materiality

Read a random definition: motion to dissolve interference

A quick definition of but-for materiality:

But-for materiality is a test used in patent law to determine if withheld information would have resulted in the patent being denied. The objective but-for test asks if the patent would have been issued if the applicant had not engaged in misconduct, while the subjective but-for test asks if the misrepresentation caused the examiner to issue the patent. The Federal Circuit has rejected the but-for materiality test in favor of a different test codified in 37 CFR § 1.56.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: But-for materiality is a test used in patent law to determine if withheld information would have resulted in the patent being denied. The objective but-for test asks if the patent would have been issued if the applicant had not engaged in misconduct. The subjective but-for test asks if the misrepresentation caused the examiner to issue the patent. The Federal Circuit has rejected the but-for materiality test in favor of the materiality test codified in 37 CFR § 1.56.

Example: If a patent applicant withheld information about prior art that would have made their invention unpatentable, the but-for materiality test would ask if the patent would have been issued if that information had been disclosed. If the answer is no, then the withheld information is considered but-for material.

Explanation: This example illustrates how the but-for materiality test is used to determine if withheld information is important enough to affect the outcome of a patent application. If the information would have resulted in the patent being denied, then it is considered but-for material and the patent may be invalidated.

bust-up merger | butlerage

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:46
do u have a dream school?
18:46
well i saw one is at fordham and one is at upenn and ik fordham isnt t14 but its better than temple and villanova
18:47
dream is duke
18:47
ooh interesting choice why Duke?
18:48
i got into fordham and so did the dumbass I was dating for like two months it’s not that hard
18:48
by which I mean if they let him in I don’t trust their standards
18:49
my dad went to duke law so i have been a fan forever
18:49
Duke is fun. I took a trip there when I was 19 or so. Really good time when I was a young rapscallion.
18:49
and ik i just dont think i gave myself enough time for a guaranteed 170+ performance
18:49
I didnt see if anyone answered my UGA question. Did anyone answer it?
18:53
@Dkkm11: are you not still a young rapscallion?
19:00
Nah, I am gray-bearded wizard.
19:02
Hmmm. I guess that’s okay.
19:03
Honestly, idk what I would call myself these days. Will probably not know until I can reflect on this part of my life which will be idk, in like 5 years when I am 32.
19:06
Does your life come in 5 year epochs typically?
19:06
Someone told me a while ago that I was probably molested as a kid because I don’t really have any clear memories of my childhood. But I don’t think I was.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:10
Inside thoughts!
19:10
this is where I post my inside thoughts
19:11
Nah, the fucked up thing about therapists is they try and make you think your parents are your enemy 99% of the time and really they should be telling you that your parents have almost no effect on the rest of your life. If they can get you to keep focusing on your parents they can keep making money.
19:12
Yeah, my life really does flow in about 5 years periods.
19:12
My crypto also flows in 5 day epochs too.
19:16
what do you do with your days as an unemployed crypto guy? do you play an instrument or something
19:47
please lawd
19:47
forgive me
19:47
its time to go back to tha old me
19:50
this is what i feel like when i get one single drill question right
19:50
when u get one wrong ;(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.