Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

call loan

Read a random definition: enabling clauses

A quick definition of call loan:

A call loan is a type of loan where the lender can ask for the money back at any time, usually with a day's notice. This is different from a term loan, which has a set due date. The borrower usually pays interest on the loan. It's important to pay back a call loan quickly because the lender can ask for the money back at any time.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A loan for which the lender can demand payment at any time, usually with 24 hours' notice, because there is no fixed maturity date.

Example: A broker call loan is a type of call loan that is made to a stockbroker to finance daily transactions. The lender can demand payment at any time, and the borrower must repay the loan within 24 hours.

Explanation: A call loan is a type of loan that is not fixed and can be called back by the lender at any time. This type of loan is usually used for short-term financing, and the borrower must be prepared to repay the loan quickly. The example of a broker call loan illustrates how this type of loan is used in the stock market to finance daily transactions. The lender can demand payment at any time, and the borrower must be prepared to repay the loan within 24 hours.

calling to the bar | call of a meeting

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:31
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
Eggan
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:32
^^^^ truuuuuu
Eggan
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
Eggan
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:32
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
Eggan
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:35
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:35
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:35
vvv hungry
Eggan
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
Eggan
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:36
CTB is it i think
Eggan
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
Eggan
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
23:02
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
23:02
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.