Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Calvin's case

Read a random definition: earnings excluding special items

A quick definition of Calvin's case:

Calvin's case: A ruling that said people born in Scotland after King James I became the King of England in 1603 were considered natural-born subjects of the English King. This meant they could inherit land in England. The decision was made in the case of Calvin v. Smith in 1608.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Calvin's case was a legal decision made in 1608 that established that individuals born in Scotland after James I became the King of England in 1603 were considered natural-born subjects of the English monarch. This meant that they could inherit land in England.

Example: For example, if a Scottish couple had a child in 1610 and that child later inherited land in England, Calvin's case would ensure that the child was considered a natural-born subject of the English monarch and could legally inherit the land.

Explanation: Calvin's case was significant because it clarified the legal status of individuals born in Scotland after James I became the King of England. Before this decision, there was some confusion about whether these individuals were considered natural-born subjects of the English monarch. This decision ensured that they were, which had important implications for inheritance and other legal matters.

calumniate | Calvo clause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.