Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Pornographic Material

Read a random definition: drug paraphernalia

A quick definition of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Pornographic Material:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that limits the sending of pornographic emails by spammers. Congress made this law to stop spammers from tricking people with misleading subject lines and opening pornographic images without their consent. The law requires spammers to clearly mark emails with pornographic content and make it harder to view those images. This helps protect people from unwanted and potentially harmful content in their emails.

A more thorough explanation:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that limits the transmission of spam emails, including those containing pornographic material. Congress enacted this law to prevent spammers from using misleading subject lines and fraudulent methods to distribute pornographic content.

According to the Senate Commerce Committee Report, pornographic spam is more likely to contain misleading subject lines than other forms of spam. The Committee also disapproved of spammers' methods of enabling pornographic images to open with the opening of a spam email.

Section 5(d) of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 addresses concerns related to emails containing sexually oriented material. This section requires clearly identifiable marks and notices to alert recipients to an email's pornographic content. It also requires technical measures to ensure that additional steps must be taken after opening an email before a pornographic image may be viewed.

For example, if a spam email contains pornographic material, it must have a clear warning in the subject line or body of the email. Recipients must also take additional steps, such as clicking a link or entering a password, before they can view the pornographic content. These measures help prevent minors and others who do not wish to view such content from accidentally accessing it.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Policy Goals and Purposes | CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Preemption

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
as far as i know, that information is simply for data collection purposes
^
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.