Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Pornographic Material

Read a random definition: assessment for benefits

A quick definition of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Pornographic Material:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that limits the sending of pornographic emails by spammers. Congress made this law to stop spammers from tricking people with misleading subject lines and opening pornographic images without their consent. The law requires spammers to clearly mark emails with pornographic content and make it harder to view those images. This helps protect people from unwanted and potentially harmful content in their emails.

A more thorough explanation:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that limits the transmission of spam emails, including those containing pornographic material. Congress enacted this law to prevent spammers from using misleading subject lines and fraudulent methods to distribute pornographic content.

According to the Senate Commerce Committee Report, pornographic spam is more likely to contain misleading subject lines than other forms of spam. The Committee also disapproved of spammers' methods of enabling pornographic images to open with the opening of a spam email.

Section 5(d) of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 addresses concerns related to emails containing sexually oriented material. This section requires clearly identifiable marks and notices to alert recipients to an email's pornographic content. It also requires technical measures to ensure that additional steps must be taken after opening an email before a pornographic image may be viewed.

For example, if a spam email contains pornographic material, it must have a clear warning in the subject line or body of the email. Recipients must also take additional steps, such as clicking a link or entering a password, before they can view the pornographic content. These measures help prevent minors and others who do not wish to view such content from accidentally accessing it.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Policy Goals and Purposes | CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Preemption

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
hey, just so u all know - i just farted
i luv u all and will be seeing u all shortly
17:02
I floated marquettes deadline hopefully someone on the WL is thankful
18:10
safety
18:56
Ughhhhhhhhhh
Lets gooo my school was gunning median this last cycle 🤣
21:37
movie recs?
starfishies
21:45
rankings out woo
eggan
22:06
NYU solos columbia any day
Washu, TX, Vandy all move up and did well at 14
I am shocked that NW drops to 10 and NYU moves up to 8
[] c0bra1
23:07
holy cow unc is 18 time to beg to get off the waitlist
[] c0bra1
23:08
"rankings don't matter" i chant as i reorder my preference list
23:22
are the rankings on US News&World Report accurate?
YM-Honor-Student
23:24
No those are incorrect
YM-Honor-Student
23:24
Kansas is t14 and Cornell is rank 50
YM-Honor-Student
23:25
@DrDresSays: I recommend Cinema Paradiso. Makes me cry everytime.
YM-Honor-Student
23:26
The rankings literally did not change in my opinion. Smh. Going by like job outcomes and constitutional law, stayed the same.
23:28
@YM-Honor-Student: thank you!
YM-Honor-Student
23:29
You are welcome!
YM-Honor-Student
23:33
UFlorida should be higher for winning march madness lol.
Napo
1:43
Oof ASU dropped hard
LovelyDay
4:46
Yeah, they’ve been heading in that direction and the methodology change made it even more pronounced. As dumb as these rankings are, think they placed ASU about right
is there somewhere that shows current versus old
TenFiftyILuvUGang
9:06
someone will have made it on reddit by the end of the day
180letmein
9:21
Brooo that shit different
180letmein
9:21
How'd Harvard drop so far
180letmein
9:22
CLS doesn't deserve to be in the T14s with the way they're acting these days ngl
180letmein
9:22
But that's just my opinion
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.