Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Pornographic Material

Read a random definition: quod clerici non eligantur in officio ballivi, etc

A quick definition of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Pornographic Material:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that limits the sending of pornographic emails by spammers. Congress made this law to stop spammers from tricking people with misleading subject lines and opening pornographic images without their consent. The law requires spammers to clearly mark emails with pornographic content and make it harder to view those images. This helps protect people from unwanted and potentially harmful content in their emails.

A more thorough explanation:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that limits the transmission of spam emails, including those containing pornographic material. Congress enacted this law to prevent spammers from using misleading subject lines and fraudulent methods to distribute pornographic content.

According to the Senate Commerce Committee Report, pornographic spam is more likely to contain misleading subject lines than other forms of spam. The Committee also disapproved of spammers' methods of enabling pornographic images to open with the opening of a spam email.

Section 5(d) of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 addresses concerns related to emails containing sexually oriented material. This section requires clearly identifiable marks and notices to alert recipients to an email's pornographic content. It also requires technical measures to ensure that additional steps must be taken after opening an email before a pornographic image may be viewed.

For example, if a spam email contains pornographic material, it must have a clear warning in the subject line or body of the email. Recipients must also take additional steps, such as clicking a link or entering a password, before they can view the pornographic content. These measures help prevent minors and others who do not wish to view such content from accidentally accessing it.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Policy Goals and Purposes | CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Preemption

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.