Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Preemption

Read a random definition: Suspect classification

A quick definition of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Preemption:

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Preemption

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that regulates commercial email. Preemption means that the law stops states from making their own laws about commercial email. However, some state laws that prevent fraud or deception in emails are still allowed. Also, laws that apply to other types of communication or computer crimes are not stopped by the CAN-SPAM Act. The courts have decided some cases about which state laws are stopped by the CAN-SPAM Act. If a state law goes beyond what the CAN-SPAM Act allows, it may be stopped by the federal law.

A more thorough explanation:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that regulates commercial email messages. Preemption is a legal concept that means federal law takes precedence over state law. Section 8(b) of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 preempts certain state anti-spam laws. This means that some state laws that regulate commercial email messages are not valid if they conflict with the CAN-SPAM Act.

For example, if a state law prohibits the use of certain words in commercial email messages, but the CAN-SPAM Act allows those words, the state law is preempted and cannot be enforced.

However, there are exceptions to preemption. State laws that prohibit fraud or deception in commercial email messages are not preempted. Also, state laws that apply to other types of communication or activity, but also apply to commercial email messages, are not preempted.

For example, if a state law prohibits fraud in all types of communication, including commercial email messages, that law is not preempted by the CAN-SPAM Act.

The issue of CAN-SPAM Act preemption has been addressed by several courts. In one case, a court ruled that a state law was preempted because it penalized non-material errors in commercial email messages. In another case, a court ruled that a university's anti-spam policy was not preempted because it fell under an exception for internet access service providers.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Pornographic Material | CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Private Right of Action for "Internet Access Service" Providers

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.