Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Preemption

Read a random definition: legal servitude

A quick definition of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Preemption:

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Preemption

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that regulates commercial email. Preemption means that the law stops states from making their own laws about commercial email. However, some state laws that prevent fraud or deception in emails are still allowed. Also, laws that apply to other types of communication or computer crimes are not stopped by the CAN-SPAM Act. The courts have decided some cases about which state laws are stopped by the CAN-SPAM Act. If a state law goes beyond what the CAN-SPAM Act allows, it may be stopped by the federal law.

A more thorough explanation:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that regulates commercial email messages. Preemption is a legal concept that means federal law takes precedence over state law. Section 8(b) of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 preempts certain state anti-spam laws. This means that some state laws that regulate commercial email messages are not valid if they conflict with the CAN-SPAM Act.

For example, if a state law prohibits the use of certain words in commercial email messages, but the CAN-SPAM Act allows those words, the state law is preempted and cannot be enforced.

However, there are exceptions to preemption. State laws that prohibit fraud or deception in commercial email messages are not preempted. Also, state laws that apply to other types of communication or activity, but also apply to commercial email messages, are not preempted.

For example, if a state law prohibits fraud in all types of communication, including commercial email messages, that law is not preempted by the CAN-SPAM Act.

The issue of CAN-SPAM Act preemption has been addressed by several courts. In one case, a court ruled that a state law was preempted because it penalized non-material errors in commercial email messages. In another case, a court ruled that a university's anti-spam policy was not preempted because it fell under an exception for internet access service providers.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Pornographic Material | CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Private Right of Action for "Internet Access Service" Providers

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:29
@LawIsForPeasants: hey.
Vandy gettin fat, that's what bandi did
Dont agree dkk but out of messages so this is a talk for another day
17:34
@LawIsForPeasants: I just want you to know that: you matter, you are important, and finally, I am proud of you. :D
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.