Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Message Redirection and Software Installation

Read a random definition: economic loss

A quick definition of Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Message Redirection and Software Installation:

The Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010 has rules about two things related to electronic messages: (1) changing the address where a message is sent without permission, and (2) sending software for download through a message. Changing the address is only allowed if the person receiving the message agrees or if a court says it's okay. Sending software is only allowed if the person receiving the message agrees and understands what the software does. Telecommunications companies are allowed to do some things without permission.

A more thorough explanation:

The Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010 has two clauses, 7 and 8, that deal with electronic messages. The first clause is about message redirection, which means changing the address where the message is sent. This is only allowed if the sender has given permission or if a court has ordered it. The second clause is about sending software for download through electronic messages. This is only allowed with the sender's permission, and they must clearly explain what the software does.

Example 1: A company sends an email to a customer, but the email is redirected to a different email address without the customer's permission. This is illegal under the Canadian Anti-Spam Law.

Example 2: A company sends an email to a customer with a link to download software. The email clearly explains what the software does and asks for the customer's permission to download it. This is legal under the Canadian Anti-Spam Law.

These examples illustrate how the Canadian Anti-Spam Law regulates message redirection and software installation through electronic messages. It is important for companies to follow these rules to avoid legal consequences.

Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Legislative Purposes | Canadian Anti-Spam Law of 2010: Opt-in Framework (Prior Consent)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.