Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

canon law

Read a random definition: actual

A quick definition of canon law:

Canon law is a set of rules that the Catholic Church follows. These rules cover things like how the church is run, what priests can and cannot do, and how people should behave in church. The rules come from the Bible, meetings of church leaders, and decisions made by the Pope. People started writing down these rules a long time ago, and now they are all in one big book called the Code of Canon Law.

A more thorough explanation:

Canon law is a set of rules that govern the internal hierarchy and administration of the Christian church, especially the Roman Catholic Church. It also covers church ceremonies, the role of clergy, religious education, discipline within the church, and any legal disputes that fall under the church's jurisdiction.

The origins of canon law can be traced back to the Bible, the decisions of church councils, and the rulings of the Pope. Scholars in the Middle Ages began compiling these laws, and they were later officially codified in the Roman Catholic Church's 1983 Code of Canon Law.

For example, canon law dictates that only men can be ordained as priests in the Roman Catholic Church. It also outlines the process for selecting and appointing bishops, as well as the rules for conducting church services and administering sacraments.

Another example is the requirement for Catholics to attend Mass on Sundays and holy days of obligation. Failure to do so is considered a sin and can result in disciplinary action by the church.

These examples illustrate how canon law governs the practices and beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church and provides a framework for its internal governance and administration.

cannibalism | canons of construction

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.