Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

captator

Read a random definition: literatura

A quick definition of captator:

A captator is someone who tries to trick or deceive someone else into giving them a gift or inheritance. This is called undue influence, which means using unfair persuasion to make someone do something they wouldn't normally do. It's like when a bully tries to make someone do something they don't want to do. In the case of a will, if someone tries to convince the person making the will to leave them something, it's called improper influence. This is not allowed because it takes away the person's free will and replaces it with the captator's wishes.

A more thorough explanation:

A captator is a person who uses artifice to obtain or attempt to obtain a gift or legacy. In civil law, this is considered undue influence.

Undue influence is the improper use of power or trust to deprive a person of free will and substitute another's objective. This can occur in contracts, transactions, relationships, or conduct. If consent is obtained through undue influence, it is voidable.

  • A wealthy elderly person is convinced by their caregiver to change their will and leave everything to the caregiver instead of their family.
  • A person is pressured by their boss to sign a contract that is not in their best interest.

In both examples, the captator is using artifice or improper influence to obtain a gift or legacy. This is considered undue influence and is not legally valid. The person being influenced is not acting of their own free will and is being coerced into making a decision that benefits the captator.

captation | captio

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.