Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

improper influence

Read a random definition: presentment of Englishry

A quick definition of improper influence:

Improper influence is when someone uses their power or trust to make another person do something they don't really want to do. This can happen in contracts, relationships, or even when making a will. If someone is under the control of another person or feels like they have to do what they say, that's called undue influence. It's not fair and can be against the law.

A more thorough explanation:

Improper influence is a term used to describe the use of power or trust in a way that takes away a person's free will and replaces it with someone else's objectives. This can happen in different situations, such as contracts, transactions, relationships, or wills and estates.

Undue influence is a type of improper influence that involves unfair persuasion of a person who is under the domination of the influencer or who trusts them to act in their best interest. This can happen when someone uses their power or position to manipulate another person into doing something they wouldn't do otherwise.

For example, if a wealthy businessman convinces a struggling artist to sign a contract that gives him all the rights to their artwork, this could be considered undue influence. The artist may feel like they have no other choice but to sign the contract because they need the money, but they are not making a free and informed decision.

In the context of wills and estates, undue influence can happen when someone uses coercion to make a testator (the person making the will) change their wishes or leave their assets to someone they wouldn't have chosen otherwise.

For instance, if a caregiver convinces an elderly person to change their will and leave everything to them instead of their family, this could be considered undue influence. The caregiver may have taken advantage of their position of trust to manipulate the testator into making a decision that benefits them.

Overall, improper influence is a serious issue that can have legal consequences. If someone feels like they have been unduly influenced, they may be able to challenge the contract or will in court and seek compensation or other remedies.

improper feud | improper means of discovery

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:44
Yeah, I would have definitely gone to the hotel if I knew they booked a room for me. At the very least, it would be proper to show up personally and explain your extraneous circumstances
Law-Shark
16:44
Nah but it's in your name. I went to an ASD. I asked the school for an extra night and they gave it to me. You just need to plan things better.
Law-Shark
16:45
This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain.
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
Does anyone have experience getting their aid package reconsidered at WashU? How long does it take to hear back after sending the form?
MrThickRopes
21:01
fo pm gon be good to us tmrw
Mr ropes is hopeful again so I am too
21:33
lets go ropes
21:53
[deleted by starfishies]
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.