Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

certificate of reasonable doubt

Read a random definition: fair warning

A quick definition of certificate of reasonable doubt:

A certificate of reasonable doubt is a document issued by a judge in a federal habeas corpus case that allows a prisoner to appeal the denial of their constitutional rights. The certificate is issued if the prisoner can show that their claim is at least debatable, meaning that reasonable people could disagree about whether their rights were violated. If the certificate is not issued, the prisoner cannot appeal. It used to be called a certificate of probable cause or writ of probable cause.

A more thorough explanation:

A Certificate of Reasonable Doubt is a legal document that is issued by a United States circuit judge in an appeal from the denial of federal habeas corpus relief. It certifies that the prisoner has shown that a constitutional right may have been denied.

For example, if a prisoner believes that their constitutional rights were violated during their trial or sentencing, they can file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. If the petition is denied, the prisoner can appeal the decision and request a Certificate of Reasonable Doubt.

The Certificate of Reasonable Doubt is issued if the prisoner can show that the claim is at least debatable, meaning that reasonable jurists would find the claim to be valid. The prisoner does not have to prove that the case would succeed on the merits, only that there is a reasonable doubt that their constitutional rights were violated.

If the Certificate of Reasonable Doubt is not issued, the prisoner cannot appeal the decision.

Overall, the Certificate of Reasonable Doubt is an important legal tool that allows prisoners to appeal the denial of federal habeas corpus relief and seek justice for potential violations of their constitutional rights.

certificate of purchase | certificate of redemption

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
A's can be rolling tho
19:25
ok yeah then i dont really need to be refreshing every hour
The UofU has been calling people with admits which is more time consuming than just mass sending that god forsaken email (when will it be my turn)
It’s almost May and that’s making me worried
Its over this cycle
:(
20:28
WL is not R it aint over till its over
20:28
Liar ass mafucka
20:28
Waitlist is R
20:28
um
20:28
ok
20:30
@c0bra1: damn right! - GI Joe
21:14
Don't loose hope frens. It aint over, till its over, brother. -Hoya Saxa
Hey if I am on a bunch of waitlists am I screwed ?
21:39
@AlejandroAI405: Not for certain. You can get off the wait list, however it can be difficult. Would you consider reapplying next year or/and retaking the LSAT? You may drastically increase your choices/outcome(s)/and possibly get a scholarship
stay strong soldiers
10:09
What is up saturday morning gunners
10:09
@llama: RandR is a fucking joke, dont do it alejandro AI lmfao
noreaster
11:06
I genuinely do think being a reapplicant has some influence on a school’s perception of you, like we didn’t want this person before so why would we want them now? If you apply to only a couple schools your first cycle and then reapply with a higher LSAT and apply more broadly you will prob have good odds at the schools you didn’t apply to before
11:24
LMFAO why wait a year to go form UGA to chicago? You make the same biglaw salary lmfao you can get the same elite pi if you finish high, which you should if you are capable of getting chicago with a r and r. This means you advocate them not earning what they could over 4 years - 90k and study then 3 years of law or 3 years of law and then 260k salary? lmfao r and r only makes sense for FC
11:25
If someone applied with a 155 and can get a 170, a lot diff than a 168 hoping for a 172 and wasting a whole year for that
11:25
Oh i know i know i know
11:26
BUt if you want 171 r and r to get a 176+ for top FC at the top schools? okay. Everything else? Take your t25.
11:26
Scholarship dollars? Tuition + 90k income is the same or slightly less than the big law salary, but without a year of career progression.
11:27
It is not a smart move to r and r, long story short, despite what people who want you to pay for essay review and lsat tutor and lsat tutor service say
noreaster
11:58
The other point I would make is that with medians rising your 3.92 GPA might be above median at your dream school one year and below the next
13:20
Both of you make valid points, but if you do not get off the W/L your only options are to R&R or just not pursue. So yea if it makes sense and you can go this year, it may be better than R&R in hopes of better prospects next yr. the devil you know is better than the angel you don't where devil is this cycle and angel is next cycel
i don't think reapplying is going to hurt you from a previously WL/denied school
just make sure you're coming with new things on your resume. maybe a higher lsat or some work experience. a school may not of wanted you this cycle, but if you come back with stronger stats, you're gonna be what they might be looking for.
overall, i'd say work on boosting your lsat though!!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.