Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

chain-of-causation rule

Read a random definition: free bench

A quick definition of chain-of-causation rule:

Chain-of-Causation Rule: This is a rule that says if someone gets hurt at work and it makes them really sad or sick, and then they hurt themselves on purpose, like by killing themselves, then their family can get money from the company to help them. It's like saying the company is responsible for what happened because they didn't keep the person safe at work.

Chain of Custody: This is a way of making sure that evidence in a court case is real and hasn't been changed. It means that everyone who had the evidence had to say where it was and what they did with it, so that no one could change it or make it different. It's like making sure that a toy you borrowed from a friend is still the same toy when you give it back to them.

A more thorough explanation:

The chain-of-causation rule is a principle in workers' compensation that states that if an employee suffers a work-related injury that leads to a mental disorder resulting in suicide, then the suicide is compensable under workers'-compensation statutes.

For example, if an employee falls from a ladder at work and suffers a traumatic brain injury that leads to depression and ultimately suicide, the chain-of-causation rule would apply, and the employee's family would be eligible for workers' compensation benefits.

The chain of custody refers to the movement and location of real evidence, and the history of those persons who had it in their custody, from the time it is obtained to the time it is presented in court.

For example, if a murder weapon is found at a crime scene, the chain of custody would document who found the weapon, who collected it, who transported it to the lab for analysis, and who stored it until it was presented in court as evidence.

The chain of custody is important because it ensures that the evidence presented in court is authentic and has not been tampered with or altered in any way. It requires testimony from each person who had possession of the evidence, and they must confirm that the evidence remained in substantially the same condition during their possession.

chain of causation | chain-referral scheme

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.