Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Child Online Privacy Act

Read a random definition: credential

A quick definition of Child Online Privacy Act:

The Child Online Privacy Act is a law that helps protect kids' privacy on the internet. It says that websites have to ask parents for permission before collecting personal information from kids under 13. If a website breaks this law, they can get in trouble and have to pay a fine. The law is enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which makes sure that websites follow the rules. So, if you're under 13, make sure to ask your parents before giving any personal information online!

A more thorough explanation:

The Child Online Privacy Act is a law that protects the privacy of children on the internet. It was passed in 1998 and is enforced by the Federal Trade Commission. The law requires websites to take special measures to protect the personal information of children under the age of 13.

According to the law, websites must make a reasonable effort to get permission from a parent before collecting personal information from a child. This means that the website must notify the parent about what information is being collected and how it will be used, and the parent must give their consent before the information can be collected.

Violations of the law are considered unfair or deceptive practices and can result in fines of up to $11,000 per violation. The FTC can also impose larger fines for more serious violations, such as those that involve many children or large companies.

For example, in 2003, Hershey Foods was fined $85,000 for maintaining a website that only required parents to fill out an online form to give consent, without any independent verification that the person filling out the form was actually the parent.

The Child Online Privacy Act is important because it helps to protect children from having their personal information collected and used without their parents' permission. By requiring websites to get parental consent before collecting information, the law helps to ensure that children's privacy is respected and their personal information is kept safe.

child custody | child pornography (CP)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.