Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

child out of wedlock

Read a random definition: guarantee clause

A quick definition of child out of wedlock:

A child out of wedlock is a baby born to parents who are not married to each other. In the past, this was considered shameful and the child had fewer rights than a child born to married parents. However, today all children have the same rights regardless of their parents' marital status.

A more thorough explanation:

A child born to parents who are not married to each other is called a child out of wedlock. This term is also known as an illegitimate child. In the past, illegitimate children had fewer legal rights than children born to married parents. However, today, most countries have laws that protect the rights of all children, regardless of their parents' marital status.

For example, in the United States, an illegitimate child has the right to inherit from their mother, and in some cases, from their father as well. They also have the right to financial support from both parents, just like any other child.

Other terms related to children include:

  • Biological child: A child who is related to their parents by blood.
  • Adopted child: A child who is legally made a part of a family through adoption.
  • Stepchild: A child who is the child of one's spouse from a previous marriage.
  • Dependent child: A child who is in need of support and care because of the death, absence, or incapacity of their parent or legal guardian.
  • Special-needs child: A child who has medical problems or a physical or emotional handicap that requires special care.

childnapping | child pornography

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.