Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

circumstantial evidence

Read a random definition: secret session

A quick definition of circumstantial evidence:

Term: Circumstantial evidence

Definition: Circumstantial evidence is evidence that doesn't directly prove something, but can lead to a logical conclusion that it's true. It requires making reasonable guesses based on the evidence. For example, if someone is accused of stealing a cookie, seeing them with crumbs on their face and finding cookie crumbs in their pocket is circumstantial evidence that they may have taken the cookie, but it doesn't directly prove it.

Compare: Direct evidence is evidence that directly proves something, like a video of someone taking the cookie.

A more thorough explanation:

Circumstantial evidence

Circumstantial evidence is evidence that doesn't directly prove something, but can lead to a logical conclusion that it is true. It requires making reasonable inferences to support the claim. For example, if someone is accused of stealing a wallet and their fingerprints are found on the wallet, that is circumstantial evidence that they may have stolen it.

  • A person is accused of murder and their DNA is found at the crime scene. This is circumstantial evidence that they may have committed the crime.
  • A person is accused of cheating on a test and their friend says they saw them studying with the answers. This is circumstantial evidence that they may have cheated.

These examples illustrate how circumstantial evidence can be used to support a claim, but it doesn't directly prove it. In both cases, additional reasonable inferences need to be made to support the claim that the person committed the crime or cheated on the test.

circuit split | cisgender

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.