Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Citations, Law of

Read a random definition: ancestral debt

A quick definition of Citations, Law of:

The Law of Citations is a rule from Roman law that says judges can only use certain juristic writers as sources of authority in court. These writers are Papinian, Paul, Gaius, Ulpian, and Modestinus. If most of them agree on an issue, the judge has to follow their view. If they are equally divided and Papinian is silent, the judge can use their own discretion. This law made it easier for judges to use juristic literature to make decisions.

A more thorough explanation:

Citations, Law of is a decree of Emperor Valentinian III in A.D. 426 that listed five juristic writers, Papinian, Paul, Gaius, Ulpian, and Modestinus, who could be cited authoritatively in court.

According to this law, if a majority of the writers agreed on an issue, the judge was bound to follow the majority view. The judge could use discretion only if the writers were equally divided, and Papinian, whose view prevailed in a tie, was silent on the issue.

For example, if four of the five writers agreed on a legal issue, the judge had to follow their view. However, if three writers agreed on one side, and two on the other, the judge could use discretion only if Papinian did not express his opinion on the issue.

The Law of Citations helped the courts deal with conflicting juristic literature by excluding a vast amount of doctrine whose relative value had not been determined. This law made it easier for judges to base their decisions on a source of principle.

citation order | citation signal

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.