Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

clear-and-present-danger test

Read a random definition: family-automobile doctrine

A quick definition of clear-and-present-danger test:

The clear-and-present-danger test is a rule in constitutional law that allows the government to limit freedom of speech and press if it is necessary to prevent immediate and severe harm to things that the government is allowed to protect. This rule was created by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in 1919. It means that if someone's words or actions could cause serious harm, the government can stop them from speaking or acting in that way. The government must prove that the harm is clear and present, meaning it is happening right now or is very likely to happen soon.

A more thorough explanation:

The clear-and-present-danger test is a doctrine in constitutional law that allows the government to restrict the First Amendment freedoms of speech and press if it is necessary to prevent immediate and severe danger to interests that the government may lawfully protect. This test was formulated by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the case of Schenck v. United States in 1919.

For example, if someone is giving a speech that encourages violence or illegal activity, the government may restrict that speech if it poses a clear and present danger to public safety. However, if the speech is simply expressing an opinion or advocating for a political position, it is protected by the First Amendment.

The clear-and-present-danger test is concerned with distinguishing protected advocacy from unprotected incitement of violent or illegal conduct. The question in every case is whether the words used are used in circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.

clearance card | clear annual value

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
cumsock
15:40
@choosingpeace: there’s plenty to do in Philly 😂 it’s a giant city
So after missing the II, I was like whatever. Maybe it's a sign to withdraw
nah making decisions off the gf is out of pocket
nahhhhh we been together since 10th grade
texaslawhopefully
15:40
I guess it depends what your goals are. If it's generic biglaw, CLS will get you the same outcome
6 yrs on January 30th
lilypadfrog
15:40
awwww <3 i love love
I also like CLS for liberal clerking. approx 41 FCOA clerks per yr
It's there if I excel. if not then I'm chill with sticking to BL
texaslawhopefully
15:41
CLS is not even close to Chicago for clerking lmao
choosingpeace
15:41
wait would yall pick CLS or penn?
I didn't apply to either but I would pick penn
15:42
penn bc im in state
no no it's not. But I wouldn't clerk conservative, so idk about Chi #s for myself
cumsock
15:42
Penn
texaslawhopefully
15:42
I guess that's fair. From what I've heard UChicago for conservatives is on par w/ HYS for clerkships
texaslawhopefully
15:42
not sure about for liberals
cumsock
15:43
They’re very similar tho
cumsock
15:43
Both t6 ivies
Is that NYU disrespect???? NYU out the t-6?
15:44
Penn because my college friends who mentored me go there
lilypadfrog
15:45
NYU is a t6 unless they don’t accept me and then idgaf what they’re ranked
texaslawhopefully
15:46
That's the best mentality
texaslawhopefully
15:46
If I get into UChicago it will be CYS
lilypadfrog
15:48
waspy I’m sure he meant to clarify that CYS is Cornell Yale Stanford
yeah just making sure
I look really good in blue tho
obviously cornell is t3
cumsock
15:49
someone from my undergrad is going to columbia for a masters in social work and the way they are talking to me im pretty sure they think thats as hard to get accepted to as columbia law
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.