Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

collaborative law

Read a random definition: in camera proceeding

A quick definition of collaborative law:

Collaborative law is a way to solve problems, especially in divorce and family situations. Each person hires a lawyer and other helpers like financial experts or coaches. They all meet together to talk and make a plan that everyone agrees on. It's like mediation because they try to be nice and not argue. But, one big difference is that they can't threaten to go to court. If someone does that, the process stops. Collaborative law can be cheaper than going to court, but it might take longer and cost more because of all the people involved.

A more thorough explanation:

Collaborative law is a type of alternative dispute resolution that is often used in divorce and family law cases. In this process, each party hires a lawyer, and they work together to negotiate an agreement. Other professionals, such as financial experts or divorce coaches, may also be involved.

The tone of collaborative law is similar to mediation, as the parties agree to negotiate terms that make the process agreeable. For example, they may agree to not use certain language or make accusations. However, one unique aspect of collaborative law is that the parties cannot use or threaten to use the court system. If a party threatens a lawsuit, the collaborative law process terminates, and the lawyers cannot participate any further in the dispute.

Collaborative law can be much cheaper than going through the court system, but because lawyers and other professionals are involved, it can also be more expensive and take longer than mediation.

John and Jane are getting a divorce, and they want to avoid going to court. They decide to use collaborative law to negotiate their settlement. Each of them hires a lawyer, and they also bring in a financial expert to help them with the division of assets. During the negotiations, they agree to not use negative language or make accusations against each other. They work together to come up with a fair settlement that works for both of them.

This example illustrates how collaborative law works in a divorce case. The parties work together to negotiate an agreement, and they agree to certain terms to make the process more agreeable. By using collaborative law, John and Jane were able to avoid going to court and come up with a settlement that worked for both of them.

collaborative divorce | collateral

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:14
Justice as Fairness!
16:14
also wow I didn’t consider that about immigration policy. hmmm
16:17
@Law-Guy: you get it
16:19
@baddestbunny: oh yeah definitly. Idk how any system of government would work if you can't distribute social goods to everyone.
MildChiller
16:33
does anyone know if the Yale webinars are cameras on?
1a2b3c4d26z
16:35
Justice as deez!
17:49
Quentin Tarantino is interested in watching somebody’s ear getting cut off; David Lynch is interested in the ear.
18:03
Quentin Tarantino can't resist putting a gay scene with a black guy participating in the gay act in his movies.
18:05
David Lynch is just gay.
18:18
Lynch is more in touch with his unconscious/dream state than the average person
18:42
Probably. I just dont know. All I know is he did a good job with Dune.
18:45
You should watch Blue Velvet
18:46
How’s your LSAT studying been going?
18:49
It is good. I have about two more weeks and I broke the 90 level on LSAT Demon which is good last night. My goal is 95 so I can probably get it before I test. It is scaled our of 100. This is for LR. My RC is below that but I know the more I get better at MBT questions the better my RC becomes.
18:50
I watched the trailer for that movie. The run time is 2 hours. May watch it on 2x the speed. Just watched se7en and thats like as graphic as I get so I kinda need a break from weird bodyhorror stuff. The sloth guy in that movie scared me.
18:51
I do like psychological horror though.
18:53
Oh jesus don’t watch the movie at all if you’re gonna watch it on 2x speed
18:54
I have never used lsat demon; how do their levels relate to actual lsat scoring?
18:56
kinda go in 20 point intervals. 20 points if you have mastered lvl 1 difficulty questions, 100 points if you have mastered lvl 5.
18:56
Getting 100 points is incredibly difficult though. anything baout 95 is pushing the 175-180 range. 90-95 is like 170-174 or so. etc.
18:56
yeah but if you’re getting a 95 on all sections what LSAT score is that? how is that calculated?
18:56
oh okay
18:57
so 100 would be a 180?
18:57
Yeah, 100 is like you would get a 180 and there's nothing more to teach you. I have only seen someone with a 100 like 2/3 times.
18:57
are you taking practice tests that are being scored though?
18:57
or just drills
18:57
Yep, they get factored into it.
18:58
I do drilling essentially every day. A timed section every 3, and a test every 2 weeks.
1a2b3c4d26z
20:06
re: WashU's URM lsat differential - fair to chalk that up to LSAT redaction weirdness messing w the scale or are they generally starved for URMs
1a2b3c4d26z
20:07
And an (albeit negligible) inverse URM GPA differential
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.