Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

collusive suit

Read a random definition: vouchee

A quick definition of collusive suit:

A collusive suit is when two or more people pretend to disagree in court, but they actually agree on what the outcome should be. This is not allowed in federal court because it is not fair. Sometimes people might try to do this to get money from insurance companies, but insurance contracts have rules to prevent this from happening. The insurance company has the right to provide a lawyer and the policyholder has to help the insurance company. This helps to make sure that everyone is being honest in court.

A more thorough explanation:

A collusive suit, also known as a friendly suit, is a legal case where the parties involved are not actually in disagreement but are working together to influence the court's decision. This type of lawsuit is not allowed in federal court because it is not adversarial.

One example of a collusive suit is when two people agree to stage a car accident to collect an insurance payout. However, insurance policies usually have exclusions for injuries caused intentionally, which means that the insurance company will not have to pay out if they can prove that the accident was staged.

Collusive suits can also occur when someone accidentally causes harm to a friend or family member. In these cases, the risk of a collusive suit is high because the parties involved may not be in disagreement about the need for compensation.

To prevent collusive suits, insurance policies often include a duty to defend, which means that the insurance company has the right and obligation to provide and control legal counsel for any lawsuit involving a claim for coverage. The policyholder also has a duty to cooperate with the insurance company's reasonable interests, and if they breach this duty, the insurance company may not have to pay out.

Overall, collusive suits are not allowed in federal court and are often prevented by insurance policies that include exclusions for intentional harm and a duty to defend.

collusive bidding | Collyer doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.