Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

colorable transaction

Read a random definition: deficit

A quick definition of colorable transaction:

A colorable transaction is a sneaky deal that looks real, but is actually fake or wrong. It's like when someone pretends to sell something for a really low price, but they're just pretending. If a court finds out a transaction is colorable, they won't let it count. This can happen with other things too, like when someone pretends to have an important job or a big claim, but it's not true.

A more thorough explanation:

A colorable transaction is a type of transaction that appears to be legitimate but is actually fraudulent or invalid. This term is often used in hindsight when the transaction is proven to be invalid. It is similar to a sham transaction, which is also a fraudulent or invalid transaction.

One example of a colorable transaction is the sale of a painting worth $100,000 for $10. In the case of O’Neill v. Delaney, the court refused to uphold this transaction because it was colorable. This means that the sale appeared to be legitimate, but upon further inspection, it was found to be fraudulent or invalid.

Another example of a colorable transaction is when a person sells a car to a friend for $1. While this may appear to be a legitimate transaction, it could be considered colorable if the seller is trying to hide the true value of the car from creditors or other parties.

Office, title, and claims can also be colorable. For example, if a person claims to be the owner of a property but does not have the legal right to do so, this claim would be considered colorable.

In summary, a colorable transaction is a transaction that appears to be legitimate but is actually fraudulent or invalid. Courts will not uphold these types of transactions.

colorable claim | Colorado

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.