Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

common-fund doctrine

Read a random definition: sham lawsuit

A quick definition of common-fund doctrine:

The common-fund doctrine is a rule that says if someone helps create, find, or save money that other people also have a right to, they can ask for their legal fees and expenses to be paid from that money. This is also called the equitable-fund doctrine.

A more thorough explanation:

The common-fund doctrine is a legal principle that allows a litigant who creates, discovers, increases, or preserves a fund to which others also have a claim to recover litigation costs and attorney's fees from that fund. This doctrine is also known as the equitable-fund doctrine.

Suppose a group of investors sues a company for fraud, and as a result of the lawsuit, the company agrees to pay a settlement of $10 million. If one of the investors hired an attorney and incurred legal fees of $100,000 to bring the lawsuit, the common-fund doctrine would allow that investor to recover a portion of their legal fees from the settlement fund. This is because the investor's legal action helped create the fund that all investors will benefit from.

Another example could be a class-action lawsuit where a group of people sues a company for damages. If the lawsuit is successful, the settlement fund will be divided among all the members of the class. However, the lead plaintiff who initiated the lawsuit may be entitled to recover their legal fees from the settlement fund under the common-fund doctrine.

These examples illustrate how the common-fund doctrine works in practice. It ensures that those who contribute to the creation or preservation of a fund that benefits others are fairly compensated for their legal expenses.

common fishery | common gambler

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
cumsock
14:39
what were ur numbers bad bleep
14:39
@BigStrongBug: i saw that bug, they buggin!!!
renard99
14:39
I also got Penn WL
14:40
@Ineedabadbleep: american does not update on lawhub
@cumsock: 3.6 UGPA and 164 LSAT
cumsock
14:40
wow congrats was that rd
@cumsock: i also had rlly good recs and good personal statement, also extensive resume
14:40
@Ineedabadbleep: okay we are stats twins kinda (if u count urm boost)
[] starfishies
14:40
they said ed earlier
Trismegistus
14:40
god i hope i evade this R or I will spiral aha
14:41
do u think we will get into emory bleep
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:41
Some of these Penn WL's got crazy stats
cumsock
14:41
maybe i shouldve ed'd somewhere fook
[] starfishies
14:41
does bc offer scholly in the A email?
jackfrost11770
14:41
Oh I got WL, I didn't see it in the status. Wild lmfao no one's getting off it I guess
lilypadfrog
14:42
wow huge penn wave. I think i applied too late to be in this
@jackfrost11770: penn waitlist?
14:42
lilypad when did u apply
14:42
i am dreading the penn r
@PuppyBot: oh ok makes sense
renard99
14:43
@jackfrost11770: It's traditionally tough to get off it but not impossible. Their waitlist isn't ranked so it's certainly within reach if you're interested enough
lilypadfrog
14:43
@ChowieBean: end of nov
i applied nov. 15 lily
or 12th
renard99
14:43
Also Jack ik you and I haven't talked in a bit but we have similar stats, backgrounds, WE. If you ever want solace in this messy process text me on Discord
14:44
im still in the queue to be reviewed for penn so
lilypadfrog
14:44
@SplitterusClitterus: I applied like two weeks later. It was one of my last apps
jackfrost11770
14:44
I mean I think you're more likely to get WL than R at UPenn lmao, I'm taking it as an R whatever
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:45
Tru
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:45
notHim at it again
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.