Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

common-law malice

Read a random definition: usee

A quick definition of common-law malice:

Common-law malice is when someone intends to do something wrong without any justification or excuse. It can also mean that someone recklessly disregards the law or someone's legal rights. It can be shown through external circumstances or knowledge that a statement is false. It is different from other types of malice, such as actual malice or implied malice.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Common-law malice is the intent, without justification or excuse, to commit a wrongful act. It can also refer to reckless disregard of the law or of a person's legal rights, or ill will and wickedness of heart.

For example, if someone intentionally harms another person without any valid reason, it can be considered common-law malice. This can include physical harm, emotional harm, or damage to property. Another example is if a company knowingly violates environmental regulations and causes harm to the environment and people living nearby, it can be considered common-law malice.

These examples illustrate how common-law malice involves intentional wrongdoing without any valid justification or excuse. It can cause harm to individuals or society as a whole, and is therefore considered a serious offense.

common-knowledge exception | common-law mortgage

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:13
I’m just tryna be like him fr fr
choosingpeace
13:13
that's crazy
Def that fulbright
choosingpeace
13:14
ohhhh
choosingpeace
13:14
i didn't even see that yep fas
lilypadfrog
13:14
why does the Fulbright have so much weight? idgi
And several pubs, and solid we. pretty awesome app
texaslawhopefully
13:14
idk I feel like that Fulbright isn't that big of a diff, there's so many countries where it is easy to get
snow
13:14
im telling yall, sictycoffees and nothim are like prime kobe and shaq
texaslawhopefully
13:14
it is prolly they just had a great overall narrative and not KJD
13:14
^
13:14
KJD 🗑️ squad
Maybe a fulbright alone isnt insanity, but pairing it with several first author pubs is sick
13:15
Besides lion ur killin jt
texaslawhopefully
13:15
yeah half tuition at CLS is fantastic
Thank you! But lowkey my page a lil fake. Withdrew from UChi after missing the II and the fact my future wife wants to leave the midwest anyways (i cant lie its mainly the first reason tho)
13:16
UChi didn’t inv u but you hit cls w half
13:16
That’s crazy haha
Honestly no clue. I missed NU waves too. Quite frankly, I think my why chicago statements were very meh
My PS and DS were sort of emotion but ended on a happy note. My why chi’s also did a little emotional stuff and I think it might’ve hurt me a bit. No clue tho🤷🏽‍♂️
Trismegistus
13:17
im pubbed in a bar association does that not mean anything wtfffff :(
13:18
@ImpartialLion: water under the bridge for you now tbh 🔥
13:18
Wonder what HLS is doing w our apps tho
texaslawhopefully
13:18
at least you're wondering lol
texaslawhopefully
13:18
I had the II and then got R'd
lilypadfrog
13:19
guys am I part of this conversation i also have a good lsat and no acceptances. I want to feel included
Trismegistus
13:19
my own alma mater straight up ignoring me too
13:19
@lilypadfrog: ur not a kjd without work experience. Back off
I think I’m headed for the HLS WL. I heard that if you get off the WL, you put down your deposit before you hear your offer? Idk how i feel ab that
13:19
*
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.