Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

common rule ex parte

Read a random definition: bottom-hole agreement

A quick definition of common rule ex parte:

Common Rule Ex Parte: A term used in court to indicate that a case will be decided by a majority vote, even if one of the parties involved does not show up. This means that the court will proceed with the case and make a decision based on the evidence presented, regardless of whether or not all parties are present.

A more thorough explanation:

Common Rule Ex Parte is a term used in legal proceedings to indicate that a case will proceed even if one of the parties involved does not appear in court. This is usually decided by a majority vote.

Billington v. Sprague, 22 Me. 34 (1842) is an example of a case where the Common Rule Ex Parte was applied. In this case, the court decided that the case would proceed even if one of the parties did not appear in court.

Another example of Common Rule Ex Parte is in a divorce case where one of the parties fails to show up in court. The court may proceed with the case and make a decision based on the evidence presented by the other party.

These examples illustrate how Common Rule Ex Parte is used in legal proceedings to ensure that cases are not delayed or dismissed due to the absence of one of the parties involved.

common-return days | common scheme

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:46
do u have a dream school?
18:46
well i saw one is at fordham and one is at upenn and ik fordham isnt t14 but its better than temple and villanova
18:47
dream is duke
18:47
ooh interesting choice why Duke?
18:48
i got into fordham and so did the dumbass I was dating for like two months it’s not that hard
18:48
by which I mean if they let him in I don’t trust their standards
18:49
my dad went to duke law so i have been a fan forever
18:49
Duke is fun. I took a trip there when I was 19 or so. Really good time when I was a young rapscallion.
18:49
and ik i just dont think i gave myself enough time for a guaranteed 170+ performance
18:49
I didnt see if anyone answered my UGA question. Did anyone answer it?
18:53
@Dkkm11: are you not still a young rapscallion?
19:00
Nah, I am gray-bearded wizard.
19:02
Hmmm. I guess that’s okay.
19:03
Honestly, idk what I would call myself these days. Will probably not know until I can reflect on this part of my life which will be idk, in like 5 years when I am 32.
19:06
Does your life come in 5 year epochs typically?
19:06
Someone told me a while ago that I was probably molested as a kid because I don’t really have any clear memories of my childhood. But I don’t think I was.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:10
Inside thoughts!
19:10
this is where I post my inside thoughts
19:11
Nah, the fucked up thing about therapists is they try and make you think your parents are your enemy 99% of the time and really they should be telling you that your parents have almost no effect on the rest of your life. If they can get you to keep focusing on your parents they can keep making money.
19:12
Yeah, my life really does flow in about 5 years periods.
19:12
My crypto also flows in 5 day epochs too.
19:16
what do you do with your days as an unemployed crypto guy? do you play an instrument or something
19:47
please lawd
19:47
forgive me
19:47
its time to go back to tha old me
19:50
this is what i feel like when i get one single drill question right
19:50
when u get one wrong ;(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.