Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

common-source doctrine

Read a random definition: ebba et fluctus

A quick definition of common-source doctrine:

The common-source doctrine is a rule that says if someone is being sued for taking someone else's land, and they both got their claim from the same person, the defendant cannot use a different source to prove they have a better claim. This is because it would be like saying the original source was wrong, which is not allowed.

A more thorough explanation:

The common-source doctrine is a legal principle that applies to trespass-to-try-title actions. It states that if a defendant claims ownership of a property under the same source as the plaintiff, they cannot prove their title using a third source that is superior to the common source. This is because doing so would be considered an attack on the source under which the defendant claims ownership.

Let's say that John and Jane both claim ownership of a piece of land that was originally owned by their grandfather. John inherited the land from his father, who inherited it from his grandfather. Jane, on the other hand, inherited the land from her mother, who also inherited it from their grandfather. In this case, the common source of ownership is their grandfather.

If John were to claim that he has a superior title to the land because he found a deed that shows his grandfather sold the land to someone else before he died, this would be an attack on the source of ownership that he shares with Jane. Therefore, the common-source doctrine would prevent John from using this deed to prove his ownership of the land.

Another example could be if two siblings inherit a property from their parents. One sibling cannot claim ownership of the property by showing a will that gives them the property, as this would be an attack on the common source of ownership, which is the parents.

common-situs picketing | common-stock equivalent

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.