Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

grandfather

Read a random definition: appellee

A quick definition of grandfather:

Term: GRANDFATHER

Definition: When a new rule or law is made, sometimes people who were already doing something before the rule was made are allowed to keep doing it. This is called a grandfather clause. For example, if a new rule says you have to be 18 to buy cigarettes, but you were already 16 when the rule was made, you might be allowed to keep buying cigarettes until you turn 18. This is called being "grandfathered" in.

A more thorough explanation:

Grandfather is a verb that means to exempt or protect a person or group from a new rule or law because they were already doing something that is now prohibited.

For example, if a new law is passed that requires all employees to have a college degree, but you have been working at the company for 20 years without a degree, you might be grandfathered in and allowed to keep your job.

Another example is if a new zoning law is passed that prohibits the construction of buildings over a certain height, but a skyscraper was already under construction before the law was passed, it might be grandfathered in and allowed to be completed.

One more example is if a new policy is implemented that requires all students to wear uniforms, but students who were already enrolled in the school before the policy was announced are grandfathered in and allowed to continue wearing their regular clothes.

These examples illustrate how the term grandfather is used to exempt or protect people or things from new rules or laws because they were already doing something that is now prohibited.

grand distress | grand inquest

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.