Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

compensatio injuriarum

Read a random definition: Defense Logistics Agency

A quick definition of compensatio injuriarum:

Compensatio Injuriarum: This is a legal term used in Scots law which means "the compensation of wrongs". It refers to a situation where two parties have wronged each other and the damages caused by each party are equal. In such cases, the damages caused by one party can be set off against the damages caused by the other party. For example, if person A defames person B and person B also defames person A, then the damages caused by each party can be set off against each other.

A more thorough explanation:

Compensatio injuriarum is a Latin term that means "the compensation of wrongs." In Scots law, it refers to the setoff in a defamation action.

For example, if Person A sues Person B for defamation and it is found that Person A also defamed Person B, then compensatio injuriarum may be applied. This means that the damages awarded to Person A may be reduced or eliminated because Person B also suffered harm.

Another example could be if Person A and Person B get into a physical altercation and both are injured. If Person A sues Person B for their injuries, compensatio injuriarum may be applied if it is found that Person A also caused harm to Person B.

Compensatio injuriarum is a legal principle that allows for the balancing of harms in a legal action. It recognizes that both parties may have caused harm to each other and seeks to provide a fair and just outcome. The examples illustrate how compensatio injuriarum may be applied in different situations where both parties have suffered harm.

compensatio criminis | Compensation Clause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.